The Effect of Faculty Development Program on Students’ Success: A concurrent mixed method Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v32i1.6007Keywords:
Faculty development program (FDP), Personal growth of students, professional growth of students, students’ successAbstract
Background: Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) are the pillars of teaching and learning in any institution. FDPs play crucial role in advancing quality teaching and learning for successful students’ outcome in medical education. FDPs can indirectly improve students’ academic performance and learning experiences through faculty enhancement of pedagogical, assessment, and mentoring skills.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of a faculty development program on students’ academic success and learning experiences.
Methods: A Concurrent mixed, methods research was done at the University of Lahore from August 2024 to January 2025 after approval by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC/40/24/07). A self-administered, validated questionnaire was distributed among second, third, and fourth, year MBBS students (n = 400). Quantitative data were analyzed on SPSS version 24. Six FGDs were done with purposively selected high, and low, achieving students. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
Results: Over 70% of students agreed that FDP, led initiatives were beneficial for clarity of learning, enhancing teaching styles and assessment feedback. The mean (± SD) scores across categories of teaching and assessment were between 3.6 (± 0.75) and 4.1(± 0.66) on the five, point Likert scale. Only 54.8% of students believed mentoring caused an improvement. Key themes from free text responses included improvement in teaching style, feedback from assessment and student confidence; whereas there were difficulties around consistency of mentoring and cognitive load.
Conclusion: Faculty development programs positively influence student learning experiences and perceived academic success. Robust mentoring systems and clinical application of improved teaching styles could be encouraged to further achieve heightened student satisfaction.
References
1. Rahman MH. Faculty development programs (FDP) in developing professional efficacy: A comparative study among participants and non-participants of FDP in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2023;7(1):100499. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100499
2. Kulal A, Nanjundaswamy A, Dinesh S, Suraj N, Mallika N. Advancing teacher competencies: assessing the influence of faculty development programs (FDP) on embracing modern innovations in teaching. J Appl Res High Educ. 2024;16(4):1301–23. doi:10.1108/JARHE-01-2024-0004
3. Hughes JA, Ofstad W, Fuentes DG. Changing the foundations of faculty development by developing a quality learning environment. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022;14(1):1-4. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.003
4. Cotta RM, de Souza Ferreira E, de Aguiar Franco F, da Costa Souza Barros G, Januário JP, Moreira TR, et al. The effectiveness of faculty development programs for training university professors in the health area: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):768. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05735-1
5. Rezai A, Ahmadi R, Ashkani P, Hosseini GH. Implementing active learning approach to promote motivation, reduce anxiety, and shape positive attitudes: A case study of EFL learners. Acta Psychologica. 2025;253(4):104704. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104704.
6. Scott T, Guan W, Han H, Zou X, Chen Y. The impact of academic optimism, institutional policy and support, and self-efficacy on university instructors’ continuous professional development in Mainland China. SAGE Open. 2023;13(1):1–19. doi:10.1177/21582440231153339
7. Shofiyyah NA, Komarudin TS, Muharam A, Juita DR. Characteristics of Generation Z and Its Impact on Education: Challenges and Opportunities. J Pendidikan Tambusai. 2024;8(1):5655-68. doi:10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13298
8. Guraya SY, Chen S. The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(4):688–97. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024
9. McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):555–84. doi: 10.1080/01421590802109834
10. Fairman JC, Smith DJ, Pullen PC, Lebel SJ. The challenge of keeping teacher professional development relevant. Prof Dev Educ. 2023;49(2):197–209. doi:10.1080/19415257.2020.1827010
11. Romijn BR, Slot PL, Leseman PP. Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in teacher preparation programs and through professional development: a review. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;98:103236. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103236
12. Wang L. The impact of student-centered learning on academic motivation and achievement: a comparative research between traditional instruction and student-centered approach. J Educ Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;22:346–53. doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.12463
13. Ahmad S, Inam S, Mirza TI, Zaman S, Ghassan A, Nishat M. Integrated medical curriculum in Pakistani educational environment its merits and demerits. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17(3):498. doi:10.53350/pjmhs2023173498
14. Mat NC, Jamaludin KA. Effectiveness of Practices and Applications of Student-Centered Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Acad Res. Progress. Educ Dev. 2024;13(3):1025-44 doi:0.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21733
15. Downing VR, Cooper KM, Cala JM, Gin LE, Brownell SE. Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020;19(2):20. doi:10.1187/cbe.19-09-0186
16. Breckwoldt J, Svensson J, Lingemann C, Gruber H. Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-6
17. Nasim F, Khan EA, Qaisara R, Shoqat I. Teaching competencies based on comparative assessment at diverse school levels. Pak J Humanit Soc Sci. 2024;12(1):259–70.
18. Khan HF, Qayyum S, Beenish H, Khan RA, Iltaf S, Faysal LR. Determining the alignment of assessment items with curriculum goals through document analysis by addressing identified item flaws. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:200. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06736-4
19. Masuku MM, Jili NN, Sabela PT. Assessment as a pedagogy and measuring tool in promoting deep learning in institutions of higher learning. Int J High Educ. 2021;10(2):274–83. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p274
20. Morris R, Perry T, Wardle L. Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: a systematic review. Rev Educ. 2021;9(3):3292. doi:10.1002/rev3.3292
21. Dang TM, Pham TQ. Alignment between course learning outcomes and assessments: an analysis within linguistic programs at a university in Vietnam. Int J TESOL Educ. 2024;4(2):31–45. doi:10.54855/ijte.24422
22. Maya J, Luesia JF, Pérez-Padilla J. The relationship between learning styles and academic performance: consistency among multiple assessment methods in psychology and education students. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3341. doi:/10.3390/su13063341
23. Fischer I, Luiz JM. Exploring gender differences in Gen Z students’ attribution of obstacles influencing their academic and professional success. Int J Manag Educ. 2024;22(2):100989. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100989
24. Gupta NK, Gupta U. Medical education–competency based medical education–how far, how near–moving from rote learning to artificial intelligence–part. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2023;16(1):1–3.
25. Carless D, Winstone N. Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teach High Educ. 2023;(1):150–63. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
26. Newsome AS, Ku PM, Murray B, Smith SE, Powell RM, Hawkins WA, Branan TN, Bland CM. Kindling the fire: the power of mentorship. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021;78(24):2271–6. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab295
27. Hubbard Murdoch N, Ens E, Gustafson B, Chambers-Richards T. A mixed method mentorship audit: assessing the culture that impacts teaching and learning in a polytechnic. Empir Res Vocat Educ Train. 2021;13:1–22. doi:10.1186/s40461-021-00119-x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annals of King Edward Medical University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments publications@kemu.edu.pk