The Analytical Performance Evaluation of Routine Clinical Chemistry Parameters by Six Sigma Approach: An Effective Tool for Laboratory Quality Management

The Analytical Performance Evaluation of Routine Clinical Chemistry Parameters by Six Sigma Approach: An Effective Tool for Laboratory Quality Management

Authors

  • Asma Rasheed Department of Pathology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), The University of Lahore (UOL)
  • Sadia Sharif Department of Pathology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), The University of Lahore (UOL)
  • Lubna Humayun Department of Pathology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), The University of Lahore (UOL)
  • Faiza Javaid Al Aleem Medical College, GDH, Lahore
  • Muhammad Afaaq Agha Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Shaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institute Lahore
  • Anam Ilyas Department of Pathology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), The University of Lahore (UOL)
  • Tahir Naeem Department of Pathology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), The University of Lahore (UOL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v30i3.5654

Keywords:

Analytical performance, Six Sigma, Quality goal index, ,Total quality management

Abstract

Background: Clinical laboratories errors can impose serious adverse effects on patient management. Clinical laboratories can evaluate their analytical performance by effective quality management tool i.e. Six Sigma metrics.
Objectives: To evaluate the analytical performance of routine chemistry parameters by Six Sigma approach.
Methods: Cross sectional study carried out from July 2022 till February 2024 in the Chemical Pathology section of University of Lahore Diagnostic Lab and Research Center, Lahore. Analytical performance of nineteen routine chemistry parameters were evaluated by using the external and internal quality control material. Only those parameters were selected who enrolled in External Quality Assurance Scheme. Inclusion criteria for IQC following West gard rule +/- 2 SD while for EQAS results follow +/- 2 Z score. Sample size for 19 parameters analyzed in EQAS from July 2022 till December 2023 was 342. 2700 IQC samples were analyzed from August 2023 till February 2024. All control values were entered in Microsoft Excel 2013 and calculated manually by conventional equations.
Results: Most of our laboratory parameters showed satisfactory analytical performance in between 3-6 when evaluated by six sigma metrics.
Conclusion:  Control frequency for parameters showed score > 6 can be reduce for saving laboratory resources whereas parameters with sigma score around 3 needs more vigilant monitoring. Health care and laboratory outcome need high quality results to improve patient health. Six sigma tool allows laboratory to identify the right method, right rule, run controls at right frequency to enable the right patient outcome.

References

Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Six Sigma Quality Management System and Design of Risk-based Statistical Quality Control. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37(1):85-96.

Geto Z, Getahun T, Lejisa T, Tolcha Y, Bikila D, Bashea C et al. Evaluation of Sigma Metrics and Westgard Rule Selection and Implementation of Internal Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry Reference Laboratory, Ethiopian Public Health Institute. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2022;37(3):285-93.

Yang C, Jou Y, Lin M, Silitonga R, Sukwadi R. The Development of the New Process of Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and Its Application. Sustainability 2022;14(15): 92-4.

Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L, Morgan T. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124(1):516- 9.

Westgard S, Bayat H, Westgard JO. Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28(2):020502.

Kumar BV, Mohan T. Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory. J Lab Physicians. 2018;10(2):194-99

Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(3):343-54.

Ercan Ş. Comparison of Sigma metrics computed by three bias estimation approaches for 33 chemistry and 26 immunoassay analytes. Adv Lab Med. 2023;4(3):236-45.

Shah S, Saini R, Singh SB, Aggarwal O, Goel AK. Six Sigma Metrics and Quality Control in Clinical Laboratory. Int J Med Res Rev 2014;2(2):140-149.

Kanani FZ, Haider Kazmi A, Kaleem B. Sigma metrics of Alinity ci system - a study on thirty-nine clinical chemistry and immunoassay parameters. Adv Lab Med. 2021;2(2):267-85.

Verma M, Dahiya K, Ghalaut VS, Dhupper V. Assessment of quality control system by sigma metrics and quality goal index ratio: A roadmap towards preparation for NABL. World J Methodol. 2018;8(3):44-50.

Ramteke TD, Chalak AS, Maksane SN. Sigma metrics: A powerful tool for performance evaluation and Quality Control Planning in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory’.JCDR. 2021;15(3):20-23

Marques PA, Requeijo JG. SIPOC: A six sigma tool helping on ISO 9000 quality management systems. In XIII Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización 2009; pp.1229-38.

Ain QU, Younas M, Haroon ZH, Kirmani SI, Munir MU, Anwar M. Fifth Generation Quality Control of Immunoassay Parameters by Six Sigma Value. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2023; 33(06):679-683.

Goel P, Malik G, Prasad S, Rani I, Manhas S, Goel K. Analysis of performance of clinical biochemistry laboratory using Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index. Pract Lab Med. 2020;23(1):e00195.

Wauthier L, Di Chiaro L, Favresse J. Sigma metrics in laboratory medicine: A call for harmonization. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;532(1):13-20.

Zhou B, Wu Y, He H, Li C, Tan L, Cao Y. Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(1):e23126.

Peng S, Zhang J, Zhou W, Mao W, Han Z. Practical application of Westgard Sigma rules with run size in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(3):e23665.

Gadde R, Hm V. Analysis of biochemical analytes using six sigma metrics with two analyzers at an Indian lab setting. Bio information. 2023;19(11):1043-50.

Karaattuthazhathu AR, Sathi P, Nair L, Ramees P, Manayani R, Benny E, et al. Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and Quality Control Planning in Clinical Laboratory: A retrospective study. National journal of laboratory medicine. 2023; 12(2):14-18

Downloads

Published

09/30/2024

How to Cite

Rasheed, A., Sharif, S., Humayun, L., Javaid, F., Agha, M. A., Ilyas, A., & Tahir Naeem. (2024). The Analytical Performance Evaluation of Routine Clinical Chemistry Parameters by Six Sigma Approach: An Effective Tool for Laboratory Quality Management. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 30(3), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v30i3.5654

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...